Supporting Families
  • banner4
  • banner2
  • banner13
  • banner7
  • banner12
  • banner6
  • banner3
  • banner9
  • banner8
  • banner10
Friday, 17 June 2011 21:24

School Transport Decisions

Kent County Council is proposing to abolish all discretionary school transport to grammar schools and faith schools, for new entrants to those schools, apart from some low income families, with effect from September 2012, primarily because of financial pressures. The measure does not apply to those living more than three miles from their nearest school where this is a faith or grammar choool.  The effect on specific groups is set out in Appendix 3 of the Papers for the relevant Agenda Item, reproduced here for convenience.

Kent County Council is recommending the following to the KCC Cabinet for a decision on Monday June 21st:........

The Cabinet is asked to agree that:

 

(i) From 1 September 2012, Kent County Council will not provide home to school transport provision on denominational or selective grounds other than where there is a statutory requirement to provide transport.

(ii) For children of low income families where the child is defined as an "eligible child" by schedule 35B Education Act 1996 (e.g. entitled to Free School Meals) and is resident in a selective area of education and aged between 11 and 16 years; Kent County Council will fund transport to the nearest grammar school provided that the child has met the entry requirements of the school and has been offered a place and it is the nearest school of that type to the child's home at a distance between 2-15 miles. This discretionary provision will align an element of selective transport policy with the statutory provision afforded to children from low income families who wish to attend a denominational school."

(iii) Any pupil in receipt of transport assistance on denominational or selective grounds prior to September 2012 will continue to retain this entitlement until they leave their current school, are no longer of statutory school age or have moved house and, following a transport assessment, are found not to be eligible under the revised policy.

(iv) In light of the many variable outcomes resulting from the changes in transport policy and how this may or may not impact on parental preferences for schools, a further review of transport will be needed in the future.

This still leaves in place free school transport for children living more than three miles from the nearest school for which they are eligible, whatever its status. This is likely only to apply to children living in rural areas of the county (there are many!),  and for grammar school children will produce somewhat of a lottery depending on whether for example the local grammar school or non selective school is nearest is on their side of town. I can visualise the situation where two families living near to each other will have a different outcome according to the precise location of their grammar school. Interestingly, the KCC statistics focus on the effect on more prosperous families and omit the key statistic of those whose eligibility for free transport is retained because they qualify under the free school meals measure, an easily available figure. Quotations such as for faith secondary schools: "28% of eligible pupils attending denominational schools are from the most affluent families in Kent" and again "A significant proportion of the most affluent also retain their eligibility. Approximately 42% of pupils from the most affluent families in Kent retain their eligibility" hint at either frustration that the proposals cannot be couched in a way to remove this subsidy or a reassurance that families are not being penalised because of their affluence. Why cannot we see the same figure for those on free school meals which are easily available?

One further statement from the agenda paper is of particular interest in other areas of the political scene: "As a result of the above findings the LA would seek to mitigate against
this by ensuring that children from low income families assessed suitable for
grammar school be extended the same level of provision as is afforded to children
from low income families who attend a denominational school i.e. they will receive
free transport to any one of their three nearest appropriate schools between 2-15
miles of their home.  This provision is to ensure that the changes do not become a
barrier to social mobility which was the founding principle of selective education"

At last we have the definition of the founding principle of selective education - social mobility!  Hear, hear!

Many of the children affected will be able to benefit from the Kent Freedom Pass, now to cost £100 annually, which allows the child to travel freely on commercial buses at school time. The major problem with this is that KCC will no longer take responsibility for ensuring there is public transport  to schools at appropriate times, or for making their own arrangements by use of school buses or occasionally taxis for children in especially remote areas. Commercial bus companies will be free to cut uneconomic routes and so there will be some children in rural areas who become unable to access their nearest faith or grammar school at all.  I am sure that one part solution will be an extension of the provision already made by some grammar schools who lay on their own bus services (at a cost to the family), but these come with their own drawbacks.

Last modified on Wednesday, 22 February 2012 23:13

1 comment

  • Comment Link Saturday, 08 September 2012 18:26 posted by .

    I would like to record the great difficulties that this new transport policy is causing in rural areas,
    I have two children currently attending the nearest grammar school who have been able to reach the school from home on the designated school bus.
    My youngest child has just entered the same school in year 7 but due to the new regulations, does not qualify for free transport.
    As a result of this we now have the ludicrous situation where a family of three children attending the same school are not permitted to travel together on the same school bus.
    Furthermore my youngest child now has to walk along a hazardous rural road for 3/4 mile alone to catch a public bus at a different time from the older children after a failed appeal to overturn this decision.
    I wonder what price KCC place on the safety of children ? PETER: I completely agree that this policy is irrational and if followed to its logical end, will see able children in rural areas, where parents cannot afford the costs being sent to inappropriate schools. Your example of children on different buses will be phased out, as once those entitled to free transport have passed through the system, the bus services will be removed as uneconomic. However, the big conundrum is what else should be cut to pay for this service.

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter the (*) required information where indicated.
Basic HTML code is allowed.